"Braille Tattoo"
Ideas issue of the New York Times Magazine, December 2007
"Arnold Odermatt: On Duty"
The Believer, December/January 2007 (about a Swiss police officer who photographed car accidents on the roads of Niwalden Canton for 40 years)
"Air-Index Impressionism"
Ideas issue of the New York Times Magazine, December 2006
"The Comb That Listens"
Ideas issue of the New York Times Magazine, December 2006
"Trust Spray" and "The False-Memory Diet,"
Ideas issue of the New York Times Magazine, December 2005
Voodoo Heart: Stories
by Scott Snyder, The Believer, June 2006
The Dead Fish Museum
by Charles D'Ambrosio, The Believer, May 2006
“Questions For Jhumpa Lahiri”
The New York Times Magazine, September 2003 (Pulitzer Prize-winning author of Interpreter of Maladies and The Namesake)
“Oldest Living Surrealist Tells All: A Conversation With Dorothea Tanning”
Salon.com, February 2002 (core member of Surrealist movement, painter, poet, wife of Max Ernst and author of Between Lives: An Artist and Her World)
A Supposedly True Thing or Two: An Interview with David Foster Wallace
Time Out New York, January 1997 (on publicaton of A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again)

Find Authors






Unlimited Media: How the Torrent of Images and Sounds Overwhelms Our Lives
By Todd Gitlin
Metropolitan Books

By John Glassie
(Wired, March 2002)

As a good grammarian, media critic Todd Gitlin winces when people refer to "the media" in the singular -- "the media is" instead of "the media are"-- but he nevertheless likes the meaning conveyed by the incorrect usage. The chief goal of his new book is to examine "the media" as a core, monolithic and unavoidable element of the current human condition. So he's okay with talking about "the media" the way we talk about "the air” and not about all those air molecules.

"The obvious but hard-to-grasp truth," Gitlin writes, "is that living with the media is today one of the main things humans do." And "the most important thing" about the media (plural here) is that "they saturate our way of life with a promise of feeling."

It's a vague and empty promise, and it has us hooked. As in our in least fulfilling love relationships, we want ever more what we can't quite have. And this, he convincingly if underwhelmingly argues, is, well, unfortunate.

Forget about individual modes of delivery and units of content. Distinctions -- between information, entertainment and advertising, say, or even between Flash animations, retail store soundtracks and TV commercials -- become less and less important. We're left, Gitlin says, with just the "prevailing human business" of experiencing the beast. The meaning of media is this experience; the point is that we have it.

Gitlin says his view (that the experience itself is the message) is in opposition with Marshall McLuhan's (the medium is the message). But content comes in last either way. If, as Gitlin argues, this media-experience addiction is responsible for a loss of feeling in our real lives, then this is indeed an unhappy truth. But at this point, it's one that's almost impossible to alter.